Oliver v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
4 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Rodgers (1977), Rogers v. State (1985)
4 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Namet v. United States · New York Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners · People v. Beard · People v. Sutton · State v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) newly discovered, (2) material to movant’s defense, (3) such that it could not with reasonable diligence have been discovered and produced for the trial, (4) not cumulative, and (5) such as to render a different result probable upon retrial. To which we add (6) that it does not attempt only to contradict a former witness or to impeach or discredit him, unless witness impeached is so important that a different result must follow, . and (7) that these facts be shown by the best evidence the case admits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“can and will, in accordance with their oath, render to the defendant and the state a fair and impartial trial on the facts allowed to be presented to them by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[e]ach party is ... given the right to challenge a certain number of jurors peremptorily or without assigning any reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Libby v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.