Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Nev. 60 - Stone v. State

Stone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1998

17 state decisions

901969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Massiah v. United States · Kurtz v. State · Letwick v. State · 145 W. Va. 354 - State Ex Rel. Sublett v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person who has been discharged by the order of the judge upon habeas corpus issued pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be again imprisoned, restrained or kept in custody for the same cause, except in the following cases: 1. If he shall have been discharged from custody on a criminal charge and be afterwards committed for the same offense by legal order or process. 2. If after a discharge for defect of proof, or for any defect of the process, warrant or commitment in a criminal case, the prisoner be again arrested on sufficient proof and committed by legal process for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We believe that the Alaska Constitutional Convention, in adopting the identical language of the Sixth Amendment [of the United States Constitution], intended that section 11 of article I of the Alaska Constitution be interpreted as seeuring to an accused such rights to trial by jury as he had been found entitled to under applicable Supreme Court interpretations of the Sixth Amendment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.