85 N.J. Super. 391 - State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1981
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3481
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Mapp v. Ohio · Escobedo v. Illinois · Malloy v. Hogan · Henry v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general rule concerning civil cases [in N.J.] is that a change in law by judicial decision is retrospective in nature...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Prospective Overruling and Retroactive Application in the Federal Courts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.