85 N.J. Super. 56 - Northvale v. Blundo’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2018
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK · Pratt v. Building Inspector of Gloucester · 69 N.J. Super. 277 - Chatham v. Donaldson · 45 N.J. Super. 516 - Zahn v. Newark Board of Adjustment · Dumais v. Somersworth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so necessary or commonly to be expected that it cannot be supposed that the ordinance was intended to prevent it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The term accessory uses as used by the courts may be predicated upon a specific provision relating to accessory uses found in the ordinance, or may be based upon the concept that whether or not the ordinance provides for accessory uses, the litigated use is one so customarily incidental to the principal use of the zoning lot that it is, as a matter of law, a part of the permitted use. [Ibid, (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It was not such a use as one could reasonably say was customarily incidental to the residential use, nor one so necessary or commonly to be expected that it cannot be supposed that the ordinance was intended to prevent it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.