State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Bell (1977), State v. Luna (1980)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dusky v. United States · State v. Roy · State v. Ortega · State v. Moore · State v. Upton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We can accept the proposition, at least guardedly, that cases may arise where, absent evidence to the contrary, the defendant’s evidence on the issue of insanity may be so clear and of such overpowering and persuasive force that reasonable minds can move only in the direction of a finding of insanity. In such a case, a court need not hesitate to rule on the issue as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Chavez“While an accused is entitled to instruction on his theory of the case if evidence exists to support it, the court need not instruct if there is absence of such evidence. State v. Ortega, 77 N.M. 7 , 419 P.2d 219 (1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Poore v. State“sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understandingand ... he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rotherham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.