Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 N.M. 173 - State v. Fransua

State v. Fransua’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
10
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably State v. Isiah (1989), State v. MacKrill (2008)

46 state decisions — followed in 10 states

170197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pace · Banovitch v. Commonwealth · State v. McFall · Martin v. Commonwealth · State v. Sims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consent is not a defense to the crime of aggravated battery” even though the defendant alleged that the”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “On March 3,1972 both defendant and the victim were in a bar in Albuquerque. Defendant had apparently been drinking heavily that day and the previous day. Sometime around 3:00 p.m. after an argument, defendant made a statement to the victim to the effect that if he (defendant) had a gun, he would shoot the victim. The victim then left the bar, went to his own automobile, removed a loaded pistol from the automobile and returned to the bar. He approached the defendant, laid the pistol on the bar and made the following statement: “I told him (defendant) that there was the gun, that if he wanted to shoot me to go ahead.” Defendant then picked up the pistol, put the barrel next to the victim’s head and pulled the trigger, wounding him seriously.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “broad discretionary powers in supervising the selection of jurors,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.