Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 N.M. 372 - Salazar v. State

Salazar v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2007

16 state decisions

601973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Delgado v. Stanley · State v. Mascarenas · State v. Vigil · 2 Ariz. App. 510 - State v. Martin · Armstrong v. United-states

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An “amended” information vitiates the original information as fully as though it had been formally dismissed by order of the court. It constitutes the filing of a new instrument which supersedes its predecessor. (Citations omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.