O'Cheskey v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 465
Relies on Ohio v. Kentucky · Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones · Hunt v. O'Cheskey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * that by imposing the tax in question on this appellant, the State has interfered with matters which the relevant treaty and statutes leave to the exclusive province of the Federal Government and the Indians themselves. The tax is therefore unlawful as applied to reservation Indians with income derived wholly from reservation sources.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.