Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 N.M. 491 - Morris v. Dodge Country, Inc.

Morris v. Dodge Country, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens Bank (1979), Santa Fe Technologies, Inc. v. Argus Networks, Inc. (2001)

34 state decisions

140197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Norfolk Monument Co. v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc. · Scott v. Brown · Hedrick v. Perry · Trebelhorn v. Bartlett · State v. Deaton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a conspiracy to exist there must be a common design or a mutually implied understanding; an agreement. (Cites omitted.) A conspiracy may be established by circumstantial evidence; generally, the agreement is a matter of inference from the facts and circumstances, including the acts of the persons alleged to be conspirators. (Cite omitted.) The question is whether the circumstances, considered as a whole, show that the parties united to accomplish the fraudulent scheme. (Cite omitted.) . . . (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “For a conspiracy to exist there must be a common design or a mutually implied understanding; an agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.