Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Ohio App. 3d 268 - State v. Horton

85 Ohio App. 3d 268 - State v. Horton’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2013

11 state decisions

60199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 80 Ohio App. 3d 150 - State v. Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a fine is imposed as a sentence or part of a sentence, the court or magistrate * * * may order that the offender be committed to the jail or workhouse until the fine is paid * * *, if the court * * * determines at a hearing that the offender is able, at that time, to pay the fine but refuses to do so. The hearing required by this section shall be conducted at the time of sentencing. * * *” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.