85 Ohio App. 3d 423 - Parzynski v. Parzynski’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “FIRST CROSS-ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR “The trial court erred in not attributing more than $1,533.00 per year plus $18,000 in spousal support as and for income to defendant/appellant/cross appel-lee.” SECOND CROSS-ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR “The trial court erred in its finding that plaintiffs income had not changed from $115,990.00.” THIRD CROSS-ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR “The trial court erred in not ordering that the spousal support paid by plaintiff be deducted from his income for purposes of computing child support.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 100 Ohio App. 3d 161 - Matrka v. Matrka

2. “the proper treatment of spousal support payments from one party to the other in a child support proceedings [sic] is not to deduct spousal support paid from the payor's gross income calculation and not to include the amount received for spousal support in the payee's gross income calculation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Kosovich v. Kosovich, Unpublished Decision (6-17-2005)

3. “spousal support actually received from a person not a party to the support proceeding for which actual gross income is being determined”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Berthelot v. Berthelot, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2006)