85 Ohio App. 3d 834 - Katko v. Modic’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably 124 Ohio App. 3d 525 - Vanest v. Pillsbury Co. (1997), Dye v. Smith (2010)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. · Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland · Colley v. Bazell · 53 Ohio St. 2d 9 - Doddridge v. Fitzpatrick · Snyder v. Stanford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he neglect of an individual to seek legal assistance after being served with court papers is not excusable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“complete disregard for the judicial system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fannie Mae v. Dent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.