State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 215 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 227 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably State v. Conway (2006), 98 Ohio St. 3d 44 - State v. Noling (2002)
10 federal appellate · 215 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · State v. Bradley · Wainwright v. Witt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 227 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the opponent of the strike must make a prima facie showing of discrimination. Second, the proponent must give a race-neutral explanation for the challenge. Third, the trial court must determine whether, under all the circumstances, the opponent has proven purposeful racial discrimination.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Finally, step three asks whether, in light of all the circumstances, the state did, in fact, have a discriminatory motive for striking the juror. The burden of persuasion always stays with the opponent of the strike. Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 , 115 S.Ct. at 1771 , 131 L.Ed.2d at 839 . The trial court's finding is entitled to deference, since it turns largely `on evaluation of credibility.' Batson, 476 U.S. at 98 , 106 S.Ct. at 1724 , 90 L.Ed.2d at 89 , fn. 21.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'the exercise of even one peremptory challenge in a purposefully discriminatory manner would violate equal protection.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.