State v. Bey’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 497 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 508 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Madrigal (2000), State v. Treesh (2001)
9 federal appellate · 497 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · Ashe v. Swenson · Smith v. Phillips · Jones v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 508 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“the admission or exclusion of relevant evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“a trial court is not required to conduct an inquiry with the defendant concerning the decision whether to testify in his defense.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.