State v. Uskert’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State ex rel. Potts v. Commission on Continuing Legal Education (2001), Judy v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (2003)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Harmelin v. Michigan · United States v. Halper · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Ohio, a license to operate a motor vehicle is a privilege, and not an absolute property right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he reinstatement fee is not merely used administratively by the BMV to process the return of the license to the driver. Instead, the funds generated from the reinstatement fee are deposited into the state treasury and credited to driver treatment and intervention programs, the reparations fund, the indigent drivers alcohol treatment fund, the Ohio Rehabilitation Services Commission, and the state treasury to be used for drug abuse resistance education programs. See former R.C. 4511.191(L)(2)(a)-(e). Thus, the state has a compelling interest to promptly remove careless drivers from the road as a public safety measure. Mackey v. Montrym , 443 U.S. 1 , 17-18, 99 S.Ct. 2612 , 2620-2621, 61 L.Ed. 2d 321 , 334 (1979). The right to operate motor vehicles on public roadways of this state may be regulated by the lawful exercise of the police power for the benefit of public safety and welfare.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As this court recognized recently, `the Double Jeopardy Clause of each Constitution prohibits (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.