85 Okla. Crim. 429 - Carr v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1961
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 71 Okla. Crim. 436 - Pressley v. State · 75 Okla. Crim. 381 - Krause v. State · 4 Okla. Crim. 202 - Berry v. State · 84 Okla. Crim. 260 - Schrack v. State · 27 Okla. Crim. 372 - Bindrum v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The object of admitting a confession in evidence is to obtain truth, and the only ground on which it is rejected is that the circumstances under which it is obtained have a tendency to falsehood, and that therefore the object is likely to be frustrated. “Prima facie any confession is admissible in evidence, and burden is on defendant to show that it was procured by such means or under such circumstances as to render it inadmissible, unless state’s evidence tends to show that fact.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.