85 Okla. Crim. 81 - Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 72 Okla. Crim. 195 - Nemecek v. State · 85 Okla. Crim. 14 - Bunn v. State · 66 Okla. Crim. 241 - Michelin v. State · 30 Okla. Crim. 82 - Stanfield v. State · 31 Okla. Crim. 322 - Frazier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the brief of the defendant presents assignments of error supported by ample legal authority and no ansAver brief contesting the contentions of defendant is filed on behalf of the state, this court indulges the presumption that-the state is unable to find authorities to dispute the proposition of law presented on behalf of the accused.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.