Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 OR 287 - Leefield v. Leefield

Leefield v. Leefield’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sturgis v. Sturgis · Weber v. Weber · State v. Nakashima · McIlvain v. Scheibley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That such a construction of the statute might, as in this instance, induce prohibited persons temporarily to leave Oregon in order to evade the laws thereof and go to some other state to consummate a marriage which if celebrated in this state would be void is a legislative question with which the courts have no right to meddle.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “viz., marriages which are deemed contrary to the law of nature as generally recognized in Christian countries, such as involve polygamy and incest, and marriages which the local lawmaking power has declared shall not be allowed any validity, either in express terms or by necessary implication * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.