¶1In his motion for reconsideration, defendant asserts that because, in our original opinion, 83 Or App 643, 732 P2d 943 (1987), we reversed his conviction for driving while revoked, we should also have reversed the victim’s assistance assessment imposed for that crime. We agree. The court should only have imposed two assessments.
¶2Reconsideration allowed; victim’s assistance assessment for conviction for driving while revoked reversed; former opinion otherwise adhered to.