Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 S.D. 431 - State v. Long

State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably 27 Md. App. 361 - Cummings v. State (1975), State of South Dakota v. Steven R. Long (1972)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

2201971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Harrison v. United States · State v. Sinnott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Probation is a matter of favor and to accomplish the purpose of the statute an exceptional degree of flexibility is essential.... Those costs, however, should not be excessive." Even though SDCL 19-5-1 appears to forbid payment of witness fees for mileage outside the state, the flexibility inherent in [the probation statute] allows such payment if not excessive. We do not believe the fee here is excessive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"An information must apprise a defendant with reasonable certainty of the accusation against him so that he may prepare his defense and plead the judgment as a bar to subsequent prosecution for the same offense." State v. Long, 1971, 85 S.D. 431 , 185 N.W.2d 472, 477 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Evidence of other break-ins in the canyon and of property removed from these places by defendants was admissible to show the motive for the break-ins, their criminal intent (which they denied) as well as common plan, scheme or system of breaking in unoccupied cabins.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.