85 So. 2d 832 - Nelson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2004
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holland v. State · Ortiz v. State · 46 So. 2d 453 - Sinclair v. State · Baxley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * This question must be resolved against appellant for he has failed to show that any ruling was ever made upon the Motion to Quash filed by him, or that the matter was duly brought on for consideration by the trial court prior to proceeding to trial. The action of the defendant in failing to obtain a ruling on his Motion to Quash, prior to trial, amounts to a waiver of the defects, if any, in the information attacked thereby. The point is accord ingly foreclosed and cannot be raised on appeal. Sinclair v. State, Fla., 46 So.2d 453 ; Section 909.06, F.S.1953, F.S.A.; Ortiz v. State, 30 Fla. 256 , 11 So. 611 ; Baxley v. State, 72 Fla. 228 , 72 So. 677 ; 24 C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 1679, p. 1205.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.