85 So. 3d 216 - Johnson v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 635 So. 2d 199 - Horton v. McCary · In re Holmes · 590 So. 2d 830 - Magri v. Westinghouse Elec., Inc. · Raspanti v. Litchfield · 4 So. 3d 138 - At Your Service Enterprises, Inc. v. Swope
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tjhere is no evidence that [plaintiff] himself knew of any of the court orders compelling discovery. [Plaintiff] never appeared in court for any of the motions to compel and/or motions to dismiss for failure to respond to the court-ordered discovery. A party who lacks knowledge of a court order cannot willfully disobey such an order. ⅜ * * [T]here is no evidence that any other sanction was considered and/or imposed. [0]ther sanctions are available. [[Image here]] Additionally, defendants never alleged that they were prejudiced in their trial preparation by the failure to comply with the court-ordered discovery. Further, there is no evidence in the record that [plaintiff] participated in the violation of the court’s orders compelling discovery as there is no evidence that [plaintiff] knew of the court orders compelling discovery. ⅜ * ⅜”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.