Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 SO3D 340 - Picard v. Picard

Picard v. Picard’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Armstrong v. Armstrong · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · Brabham v. Brabham · Reddell v. Reddell · 689 So. 2d 916 - Ex Parte Gentry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Substantial contribution to the accumulation of the property; (2) The degree to which each spouse has expended, withdrawn, or otherwise disposed of marital assets and any prior distribution of such assets by agreement, decree, or otherwise; (3) The market value and the emotional value of the assets subject to distribution; (4) The value of assets not ordinarily, absent equitable factors to the contrary, subject to such distribution, such as property brought to the marriage by the parties and property acquired by inheritance or inter vivos gift by or to an individual spouse; (5) Tax and other economic consequences, and contractual or legal consequences to third parties, of the proposed distribution; (6) The extent to which property division may, with equity to both parties, be utilized to eliminate periodic payments and other potential sources of future friction between the parties; (7) The needs of the parties for financial security with due regard to the combination of assets, income, and earning capacity; and, (8) Any other factor which in equity should be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.