Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 SO3D 683 - In Re Jordan

In Re Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on T.D. v. M.M.M. · In re Jefferson · In re Baylis · 30 So. 3d 728 - In Re Petal · State v. LeBlanc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “^Standing alone, the unauthorized practice of law conclusively demonstrates that petitioner lacks the moral fitness to be admitted to the bar. The improper fee-sharing and the conduct arising out of the incident in law school simply serve to underscore the conclusion that petitioner possesses serious and fundamental character flaws. Given the egregious nature of petitioner’s wrongdoing, as well as her pattern of conduct occurring over many years, we can conceive of no circumstance under which we would ever grant her admission to the practice of law in this state. Accordingly, we will deny her application for admission. Furthermore, no applications for admission will be accepted from petitioner in the future.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.