85 So. 3d 712 - In re Lorusso’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 614 So. 2d 697 - Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co., Inc. v. Tarver · 627 So. 2d 158 - American Waste v. St. Martin Parish · 782 So. 2d 582 - Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics · 888 So. 2d 812 - Prator v. Caddo Parish · 57 So. 3d 1188 - Steiner v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. (1) Whenever ... .any public servant or person is aggrieved by any action taken by the [BOE], or panel thereof ... he may appeal to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. (a) An order of the [BOE], or panel thereof, may be appealed by filing a written motion with the [BOE] within thirty days after the signing and transmission of the notice of the order. * * * [ (2) ] (b) If the [BOE] does not prevail in the final disposition of its appeal, the [BOE] shall be responsible for the payment of reasonable attorney fees and court costs of the other party inclusive of all stages of litigation and appeal. (c) The amount of attorney fees shall be determined by the court of appeal and shall be set forth in the court’s judgment. (3) Any refusal by the [BOE] to issue a declaratory opinion is subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of the appellate court as provided by Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Louisiana. The Court of Appeal, First Circuit, shall promulgate rules of procedure to be followed in taking and lodging such appeals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Jelks“In the context of declaratory judgment, 1 a justiciable controversy must involve uncertain or disputed rights in an immediate and genuine situation, and must be a substantial and actual dispute as to the legal relations of parties having real, adverse interests. Steiner v. Reed, 2010-1465, p. 6 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/11/11), 57 So.3d 1188,1192 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.