Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 SW3D 110 - Litton v. Kornbrust

Litton v. Kornbrust’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital · Nelson v. Waxman · Wells v. Orthwein · Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. (internal quotation omitted). A trial court abuses its discretion if its ruling is clearly against the logic of the circumstances and is so unreasonable and arbitrary that it shocks the sense of justice and indicates a lack of careful, deliberate consideration. Id. Analysis Simply put, this is not a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the extent and scope of cross-examination in a civil action is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is clearly shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he admissibility of evidence lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, including the introduction of evidence for the purposes of impeachment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.