Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 S.W.3d 283 - Rushing v. State

Rushing v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Marin v. State · Saldano v. State · Galitz v. State · Armadillo Bail Bonds v. State · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Said Court of Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction co-extensive with the limits of their respective districts, which shall extend to all cases of which the District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law. Provided, that the decision of said courts shall be conclusive on all questions of fact brought before them on appeal or error. Said courts shall have such other jurisdiction, original and appellate, as may be prescribed by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “particular kind of jurisdictional claim of legislative creation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re DW

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.