Knese v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Arizona v. Fulminante · Wainwright v. Witt · Adams v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ne aspect of this right is adequate voir dire to identify unqualified jurors.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] veniremember should be asked if he or she holds any prejudices or biases that would 'prevent or substantially impair the performance of his [or her] duties as a juror in accordance with his [or her] instructions and his [or her] oath.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“At a minimum, counsel should have read the questionnaires, and voir dired to determine whether they could serve as jurors. Failure to do so is ineffective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McFadden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.