Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 SW3D 709 - Moore v. Weeks

Moore v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital · Wilkerson v. Prelutsky · Alcorn v. Union Pacific Railroad · Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Zykan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the context of Rule 61.01(b)[ 4 ], an abuse of discretion can occur when the sanctions exceed that which is necessary to accomplish the purposes of discovery. The rules of discovery are designed to allow the litigants to determine the facts prior to trial, obtain access to information about the respective contentions, to preserve evidence, prevent concealment and unjust surprise, and formulate issues for trial. The rules must be enforced to achieve these objectives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'Laches’ is the neglect for an unreasonable and unexplained length of time under circumstances permitting diligence, to do what in law, should have been done.” Metro St. Louis Sewer Dist. v. Zykan, 495 S.W.2d 643, 656 (Mo.1973) (internal quotation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.