Walder v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Douglas v. People of State of California · Jones v. Barnes · Evitts v. Lucey · McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel should explain how the issue or point presented has been preserved for appellate review . . . with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re DM“counsel should explain . . . why no preservation is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re DM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.