Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Tex. 39 - Davis v. Laning

Davis v. Laning’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2002

14 state decisions

40189219001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If he can he sued and his property seized by his creditors after conviction, as has been held; if he can dispose of it by will, to vest as he shall direct after his death, then clearly he is neither dead in fact nor in law, and a fortiori there can be no descent of his estate to ‘his heirs at law,’ under such circumstances.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.