Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 U.S. 332 - Cook v. Tullis

Cook v. Tullis’s Empirical Analysis

85 U.S. 332 · 1873

Citation profile

189
cited by 189 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 14 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 189 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably New York County National Bank v. Massey (1904), Dean v. Davis (1917)

59 federal appellate · 14 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 24 states

3501873188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 189 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “essential that the party ratifying should be able not merely to do the act ratified at the time the act was done, but also at the time the ratification was made.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “‘ There is nothing in the bankrupt act, either in its language or object, which prevents an insolvent from dealing with his property, selling or exchanging it for other property at any time before proceedings in bankruptcy are taken by or against him. provided such dealing be conducted without any purpose to defraud or delay his creditors or give preference to any one, «.ad does not impair the value of his estate. An insolvent is not bound, in the misfortune of his insolvency, to abandon all dealing with his property; his creditors can only complain if he waste his estate or give preference in its disposition to one over another. His dealing will stand if it leave his estate in as good plight and condition as previously.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.