Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 VA 638 - Mings v. Commonwealth

Mings v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2006

13 state decisions

301889189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Burke · Bailey v. Commonwealth · Coleman v. Commonwealth · Boxley v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The crime, however, really consists in the ravishment of a woman without her consent; and the question, therefore, always is, was the woman willing or unwilling? And if it appear that carnal intercourse was effected with her without her consent, the crime of rape is proved, although no positive resistance of the will be shown. Or, as Bishop expresses it, ‘wherever there is a carnal connection without anything which can be deemed a consent—where there is neither a consent fraudulently procured, nor any other sort of consent—by the woman, there is evidently, in the wrong ful act itself, all the force which the law demands as an element of the crime.’ 2 Bish. Crim. Law, sec. 1078.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.