Hazel v. Van Beek’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Wysong v. People of the State of California · 120 Wash. 2d 439 - Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin County · 110 Wash. 2d 793 - In Re the Personal Restraint of King · 121 Wash. 2d 513 - Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries · 123 Wash. 2d 530 - Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is entitled to an order confirming the sale at any time after twenty days have elapsed from the mailing ... unless the judgment debtor ... shall file objections to confirmation with the clerk within twenty days after the mailing....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is evidently not the intention of the law to allow an indefinite time to elapse before an objection to a confirmation is made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hazel v. Van Beek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.