Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Wash. App. 150 - Fray v. Spokane County

85 Wash. App. 150 - Fray v. Spokane County’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2023

15 state decisions

701997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Locke · State v. Thorne · State v. Manussier · Washington Fed. of State Emp. v. State · 117 Wash. 2d 655 - City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “AN ACT Relating to making technical corrections to chapter 35, Laws of 1991; amending RCW 41.26.005 . . . adding a new section to chapter 41.26 RCW . . . recodifying RCW 41.26.058. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Legislature granted LEOFF Plan II members the “right to sue” their employers for negligence. The attempted amendment by the Legislature in 1992 violates both sections 19 and 37 of article II of the Washington State Constitution. Deputy Fray’s receipt of benefits under the Industrial Insurance Act also does not bar his right to sue his employer. We reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and reinstate Deputy Fray’s cause of action.[ 18 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[the bill's title] does not give fair notice that ... Plan II members no longer have the right to sue their employers....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.