Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Wash. App. 539 - Gross v. Evert-Rosenberg

85 Wash. App. 539 - Gross v. Evert-Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2015

13 state decisions

80199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 148 - Wichert v. Cardwell · Sheldon v. Fettig · 67 Wash. App. 548 - Lepeska v. Farley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The inquiry is whether the Federal Way home was a center of domestic activity for Evert-Rosenherg [the defendant]. Unlike the facts in Sheldon, where the adult-child defendant was deemed to have more than one usual abode, one in Illinois and one at her parents’ home in Washington state, here Evert-Rosenberg, the parent, moved to a new home, retaining ownership of the Federal Way house but actually residing in another abode. Although the tenants in the old home were related to Evert-Rosenberg, they had a completely different center of domestic activity. We refuse to extend the Sheldon holding to these facts. The facts of this case are similar to those found in Lepeska v. Farley where this court held that substitute service on a son through his parents’ home at a time when he maintained his own separate home within the jurisdiction failed to comply with the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a place where the defendant's domestic activity is centered and where service left with a family member is reasonably calculated to come to the defendant's attention within the statutory period for making an appearance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.