85 Wash. App. 82 - State v. Ralph’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2011
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 119 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Johnson · State v. Morgan · 65 Wash. App. 752 - State v. Hale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The information need not use the exact words of a statute so long as the words used adequately convey the same meaning. Under the rule set forth in Johnson , the language in the information is strictly construed and facial deficiencies are not upheld.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“is commonly understood to include taking property of another with the intent to deprive. We conclude that, liberally construed, the missing elements can be inferred from the allegation of theft. III. Possession of Stolen Property Tresenriter also challenges the sufficiency of the charge of possession of stolen property. The information alleged: In that the defendant, MICHAEL JAY TRESENRITER, ... did knowingly possess property of a value greater than $250 knowing it was stolen. Tresenriter argues that the charge is deficient because it gives no notice”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tresenriter“If the information fails to state the necessary elements, then the information is insufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.