85 Wash. App. 98 - Goad v. Hambridge’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST. (2005), 89 Wash. App. 809 - Brin v. Stutzman (1998)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 506 - ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co. · 120 Wash. 2d 439 - Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin County · 26 Wash. App. 430 - Streater v. White · Birklid v. Boeing Co. · 104 Wash. 2d 710 - Stenberg v. Pacific Power & Light Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appeal is frivolous only `if no debatable issues are presented upon which reasonable minds might differ, and it is so devoid of merit that no reasonable possibility of reversal exists.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The sole basis for the Goads’ claims is [the employer’s] alleged failure to provide a safe workplace and Mr. Goad’s resulting injury. Their emotional distress claims stem directly from Mr. Goad’s injury; the conduct they complain of for those claims is the same conduct at issue in their claims for the workplace injury The Goads’ emotional injuries are not of a different nature, did not arise at different times, and do not have different causal factors from the injury to Mr. Goad’s hand. These claims therefore do not have an existence separate from the Industrial Insurance Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“actual knowledge that an injury was certain to occur and [willful] disregard [of] that knowledge was an act with deliberate intention”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howland v. Grout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.