Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Wis. 615 - Proper v. State

Proper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
14
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Bracey v. United States (1944), Commonwealth v. King (1982)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 39 state decisions — followed in 14 states

1001893190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Sharp · Thayer v. Thayer · Farris v. People · People v. . O'Sullivan · Commonwealth v. Choate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon a prosecution for adultery, evidence of previous acts of improper familiarity, amounting to adultery, between the same persons, was held competent either in corroboration of witnesses for the prosecution ...” (Emphasis supplied.) P. 630.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We do not suppose that evidence that the defendant had committed adultery or been guilty of acts of improper familiarity with the girl Emma at another time and • place would be competent evidence on the trial of the present issue.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A greater latitude of proof as to other like occurrences is allowed in cases of sexual crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.