85 Wis. 2d 383 - Damp v. Zabel’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1995
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 67 Wis. 2d 130 - Garriguenc v. Love · 44 Wis. 2d 45 - Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance · 47 Wis. 2d 442 - Haines v. Mid-Century Insurance · 56 Wis. 2d 632 - Limpert v. Smith · 57 Wis. 2d 706 - Smith v. National Indemnity Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are confident that sec. 204.34(2) [now sec. 632.32(6)(b)l] was not intended by the legislature to prohibit the issuing company from extending greater coverage to one or more members of the family of the named insured than required under sec. 204.30(3) [now sec. 632.32(3)] without extending such coverage to all members of such family. We, therefore, construe sec. 204.34(2) as not applicable to extended coverage provisions of a policy of automobile liability insurance which extend coverage beyond that required by sec. 204.30(3), where the policy contains no express exclusion clause which discriminates against any person related by blood or marriage to the insured as to such extended coverage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the limitation of such coverage by definition of policy's terms could not subtract anything from coverage previously granted by statute or in the policy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“coverage to autos other than those owned by members of the named insured's household contained in Robert's policy constituted an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.