Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Wis. 2d 595 - Bergeron v. State

85 Wis. 2d 595 - Bergeron v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock (1989), 131 Wis. 2d 153 - State v. Fry (1986)

31 state decisions

210197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “commences with an agreement between 2 or more persons to direct their conduct toward the realization of a criminal objective and each member of the conspiracy must individually and consciously intend the realization of the particular criminal venture. Additionally, each conspirator must have an individual stake in the conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 103 Wis. 2d 152 - State v. Dorcey · State v. Chrystul D. Kizer
  2. “[w]hile it may readily be conceded that hearsay rules and the Confrontation Clause are generally designed to protect similar values, it is quite a different thing to suggest that the overlap is complete and that the Confrontation Clause is nothing more or less than a codification of the rules of hearsay and. their exceptions as they existed historically at common law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Manuel
  3. ““908.01 Definitions. The following' definitions apply under this chapter: “(4) Statements which aee not hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if: “(b) Admission by party opponent. The statement is offered against a party and is: “5. A statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 103 Wis. 2d 152 - State v. Dorcey

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.