Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 F.2d 1321 - Rozay's Transfer v. Local Freight Drivers Local International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen Helpers America

Rozay's Transfer v. Local Freight Drivers Local International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen Helpers America’s Empirical Analysis

850 F.2d 1321 · 1988

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 1 Cal. 4th 976 - Lusardi Construction Co. v. Aubry (1992), Brooker v. Desert Hospital Corp. (1991)

46 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

5901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1145 (§ 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “carves out a broad exception to the NLRB's primary jurisdiction for claims arising out of collective bargaining agreements, whether or not such claims would also be an unfair labor practice....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]ection 301 ... applies not only to suits for breach of a collective bargaining agreement once it is duly formed, but also to suits impugning the existence and validity of a labor agreement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “entertain this action alleging fraudulent inducement in the formation of the agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.