Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 F.2d 1345 - Pope v. Savings Bank of Puget Sound

Pope v. Savings Bank of Puget Sound’s Empirical Analysis

850 F.2d 1345 · 1988

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. (1989), Sos Inc v. Payday Inc

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

2301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Ingraham v. Wright · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reject[ed] any suggestion that lawyers must recite formal incantations of each intended use and application of proffered evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “We recall the first lesson in contracts, the peppercorn theory -- that courts will not inquire into the adequacy of consideration so long as it was true and valuable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The totality of the circumstances here [manifested] that the attorney slept on his client's rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.