Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 F.2d 259 - Andre v. Guste

Andre v. Guste’s Empirical Analysis

850 F.2d 259 · 1988

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
February 2011
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2011

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kuhlmann v. Wilson · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Erie Lackawanna, Inc. · Jones v. Wj Estelle · Ganger v. Peyton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the prisoner] simply suggests that he should be allowed to maintain the present action because he was unable to appeal his prior petition’s dismissal [due to the fault of either his own counsel, the Fifth Circuit, or the United States Postal Service]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “this reason [resurrection of the right to appeal] is insufficient to prevent the district court from determining that [the] second petition should be dismissed as repetitive pursuant to Rule 9(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “There is no reason to infer that McCleskey changed our previous rule that abuse of the writ may be pleaded by the state or raised by the district court sua sponte”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.