Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 F.2d 368 - International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers, District Lodge No. 19, v. Soo Line Railroad Company

International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers, District Lodge No. 19, v. Soo Line Railroad Company’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably In re Bieter Co. (1994), Hosna v. Groose (1996)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

24019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Elgin Ry Co v. Burley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Abuse of discretion occurs if the district court rests its conclusion on clearly erroneous factual findings or if its decision relies on erroneous legal conclusions.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “carrier may apply its reasonable interpretation of the disputed agreement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the parties disagree whether the dispute can be resolved by reference to an agreement, the dispute is minor unless the claims of contractual justification are 'frivolous' or 'obviously insubstantial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.