Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 F.2d 461 - Gometz v. Culwell

Gometz v. Culwell’s Empirical Analysis

850 F.2d 461 · 1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Gooden v. Howard County (1992), Munz v. Michael (1994)

14 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

1201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not enough, however, for a plaintiff to make merely broad or conclusory allegations concerning the existence of such a conspiracy or to show only that a state official took some action which was, in some way, unfavorable to him- Rather, plaintiffs must allege with sufficient particularity and show with specific material facts that the [parties] reached some understanding or agreement, or plotted, planned and conspired together, to deprive plaintiffs of a federal right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.