Landreth Ore v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
850 F.2d 532 · 1988
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Barnhart v. United States (1989), Kahale v. City and County of Honolulu (2004)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · United States v. Kubrick · Darring v. Kincheloe · Mills v. Rogers · Ashton v. Cory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a claim accrues when the plaintiff discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury and its cause.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The fact of minority does not toll the statute [of limitations established by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2401 (b) ].”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.