Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 So. 2d 1035 - State v. MacK

850 So. 2d 1035 - State v. MacK’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Barker v. Wingo · Tibbs v. Florida · Angrist v. United States · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]s held by the supreme court in State v. Baylis, 388 So.2d 713 (La.1980), when a defendant's objection to improper remarks is overruled, he is not required to make a useless motion for admonition or a mistrial to preserve his rights on appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Once a defendant has been tried and convicted, his allegation that article 701 has been violated becomes moot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.