Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 SO2D 223 - Hill v. State

Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 703 So. 2d 266 - Walker v. State · 742 So. 2d 1190 - Scott v. State · 732 So. 2d 883 - Clemons v. State · Triplett v. State · Payton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his Court will only under exceptional circumstances second guess counsel on matters of trial strategy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Basic defense in this case required complete investigation to ascertain every material fact about this case, favorable and unfavorable. It required familiarity with the scene, and the setting. It required through his own resources and process of the court learning the names of, and interviewing every possible eyewitness, and getting statements from each. It required prior to trial learning all information held by the state available to the defense through pre-trial discovery motions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]ounsel's choice of whether or not to file certain motions, call witnesses, ask certain questions, or make certain objections fall[s] within the ambit of trial strategy and will not stand as support for an ineffective[-]assistance[-]of[-]counsel claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.