850 So. 2d 459 - DSS v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 370 So. 2d 795 - In Interest of ME · Duncan v. State · 504 So. 2d 1270 - Anderson v. State · 481 So. 2d 14 - RC v. State · 400 So. 2d 1059 - RA v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ownership of the building or structure is a material element of the crime of burglary. In re M.E., 370 So.2d 795, 796 (Fla.1979).... The purposes of the ownership element are to prove the accused does not own the property and to sufficiently identify the offense to protect the accused from a second prosecution for the same offense. In re M.E., 370 So.2d at 796-97 . This Court has held that the ownership element in burglary is not the same as ownership in property law but, rather, means “any possession which is rightful as against the burglar and is satisfied by proof of special or temporary ownership, possession, or control.” Id. at 797 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.